NICAR 2015: Finding the elusive data/prose sweet spot

Before I become a good data journalist, even an adept data journalist, there is a skill I really need to nail down: balancing data and anecdotes in an easy-to-understand narrative. Super simple stuff, right? Wrong. It’s a skill that I was drilled and tested on in a handful of courses at Medill, but I don’t feel I've reached the sweet-spot where numbers are present, yet not boring facts that most readers skip.

Coming into NICAR 2015, I was really hoping to get help with this.

Only one day into the conference, I had all my questions answered, and a million more opened and unresolved.

Before I even got a chance to address the finer points of the balancing act, I attended a talk by ProPublica’s Scott Klein on the history of data visualization. Surprisingly, and completely unsurprisingly, his talk prodded at my issue, as it existed long before I was able to think about it.

A 1780s line graph made by William Playfair.

Ever since William Playfair line, pie and bar charts in the late 1700s, journalists have been trying their hardest to use them in data-heavy stories. From the first line chart in an 1842 edition of the Bombay Times, to extensive mapping and pie charting stemming from the 1870 U.S. Census, and the Wall Street Journal’s first commodities chart in 1921, journalists have been experimenting with the possibilities and occasionally hitting gold.

Klein’s talk was incredibly interesting, and I came away with a few more books on my ever-growing reading list, but there was a bigger take away: visualizations of data have never been considered intuitive.

“We take this for granted, we would assume that any child would know how to read a line chart, but in 1849 they couldn't,” Klein said. “Every graphic I just showed has a florid description on how to read it. It’s not intrinsic.” Klein explained that you can use design hierarchy to guide the reader, but sometimes, no matter how simple you think your visualization is, you have to straight up tell readers how to read the data.

So, before I got a chance to really address my questions, Klein threw a huge wrench in my thought process. If I cannot assume that new visualization techniques are intuitive, where is the line between those that can be taught and those that cannot? I’m going to spoil this right now: I still don’t have the answer. But a panel I attended later in the day helped me chip away at it.

Right off the bat, the session on ‘Humanizing Numbers’ promised to be rewarding.

“What is a number?” New York Times’ Ron Nixon asked the audience, semi-rhetorically. “Numbers are simply numeric representation of things in the real world.” This might not comfort a high school calculus student, but it really makes sense in journalism.

The numbers we work with are never just numbers. They are people, animals, violence, or environmental issues. For a story to really work, the face behind the number needs to be found and highlighted, because, as panel member Katie Park of The Washington Post pointed out, a number “doesn't make you feel anything. It doesn't let you know anything about the people who make up the data.”

As Nikole Hannah-Jones, a panel member from ProPublica, puts it, journalists love the data because it proves a story exists. But readers don’t care about the full data. If they did, they would go out and find it themselves. By drawing out the face behind the number, you’re not just avoiding the glazed-eye effect, you’re giving the reader a reason to go on to the next paragraph. A story made entirely of numbers will send readers running, but a story based entirely on numbers might actually keep them around.

This is fairly easy to comprehend in the abstract, but when it comes to actual implementation there is room for extensive experimentation. Park has used a number of methods to humanize her numbers. She said her sketches might start out as simple bar charts, but they will often end with points replaced with the names of victims, or forty unique children’s onesies instead of a simpler histogram repeated forty times.

She suggests keeping the idea behind the visualization simple, and adding layers to make it hit home with the reader. Simple variations on well-known techniques means you can have a really powerful visualization without a tedious explanation on how to read it.

Even still, Park said she finds times where her attempts are too much. “Sometimes you get to the point where a data-visualization just doesn't tell the story, sometimes a simple picture is all the visualization that is needed," she said.

In other words, just because it’s a data story doesn't mean you get to skimp out on the intense reporting, lengthy interviews, road trips, and photography that make any story great.

“Humanizing numbers is a reporting challenge rather than a story challenge,” Ryan Gabrielson, another ProPublica panel member pointed out. You use the data to find the story, not as the story itself.

“Too often we settle for phone calls, settle for the best answer they can give off the top of their head,” Gabrielson added. “Always go to the paper and the people that underlie the data.”

On the other extreme, Gabrielson pointed out that “too often when we think of humanizing, we think about who is the lead anecdote.” This is where the middle ground exists: between stories that reads like annual reports and anecdote driven narratives that fail to consider the data whatsoever. Herein lies that sweet-spot.

There may not be a universal sweet-spot between the two, but there is one for every story. It’s where the data leads you to a person or an experience that represents the archetype of the data. It’s where the numbers you use are sparse and powerful. It’s where your visualizations are simple, clean, humanized, and either intuitive or simply explained.

The difference between knowing this balance exists and executing it is immense. There are hundreds of editorial decisions between starting a story and releasing a polished project, and any one of them can lead you astray. I make no claim to being able to navigate this path successfully, and many of my data stories have failed miserably because I find it very difficult to drop my excitement for the numbers. But you can tell when a team pulls it off, and not just because the story rakes in awards. In the words of Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, “I know it when I see it.”

About the author

Luke Rague

Graduate Fellow

Latest Posts

  • Introducing StorylineJS

    Today we're excited to release a new tool for storytellers.

    StorylineJS makes it easy to tell the story behind a dataset, without the need for programming or data visualization expertise. Just upload your data to Google Sheets, add two columns, and fill in the story on the rows you want to highlight. Set a few configuration options and you have an annotated chart, ready to embed on your website. (And did we mention, it looks great on phones?) As with all of our tools, simplicity...

    Continue Reading

  • Join us in October: NU hosts the Computation + Journalism 2017 symposium

    An exciting lineup of researchers, technologists and journalists will convene in October for Computation + Journalism Symposium 2017 at Northwestern University. Register now and book your hotel rooms for the event, which will take place on Friday, Oct. 13, and Saturday, Oct. 14 in Evanston, IL. Hotel room blocks near campus are filling up fast! Speakers will include: Ashwin Ram, who heads research and development for Amazon’s Alexa artificial intelligence (AI) agent, which powers the...

    Continue Reading

  • Bringing Historical Data to Census Reporter

    A Visualization and Research Review

    An Introduction Since Census Reporter’s launch in 2014, one of our most requested features has been the option to see historic census data. Journalists of all backgrounds have asked for a simplified way to get the long-term values they need from Census Reporter, whether it’s through our data section or directly from individual profile pages. Over the past few months I’ve been working to make that a reality. With invaluable feedback from many of you,......

    Continue Reading

  • How We Brought A Chatbot To Life

    Best Practice Guide

    A chatbot creates a unique user experience with many benefits. It gives the audience an opportunity to ask questions and get to know more about your organization. It allows you to collect valuable information from the audience. It can increase interaction time on your site. Bot prototype In the spring of 2017, our Knight Lab team examined the conversational user interface of Public Good Software’s chatbot, which is a chat-widget embedded within media partner sites.......

    Continue Reading

  • Stitching 360° Video

    For the time-being, footage filmed on most 360° cameras cannot be directly edited and uploaded for viewing immediately after capture. Different cameras have different methods of outputting footage, but usually each camera lens corresponds to a separate video file. These video files must be combined using “video stitching” software on a computer or phone before the video becomes one connected, viewable video. Garmin and other companies have recently demonstrated interest in creating cameras that stitch......

    Continue Reading

  • Publishing your 360° content

    Publishing can be confusing for aspiring 360° video storytellers. The lack of public information on platform viewership makes it nearly impossible to know where you can best reach your intended viewers, or even how much time and effort to devote to the creation of VR content. Numbers are hard to come by, but were more available in the beginning of 2016. At the time, most viewers encountered 360° video on Facebook. In February 2016, Facebook......

    Continue Reading

Storytelling Tools

We build easy-to-use tools that can help you tell better stories.

View More