Rethinking the listicle. What can it do for "serious" news?

Odds are, you’ve read more than a handful of listicles.

They proliferate social media, they’re sweet and short (but short on nutrition), and in a culture of distraction, it's hard not to love a numbered article.

This October, I facilitated a session at Mozilla Festival, seeking to discover where these listicles belong "serious" news reporting.

The proposal might sound strange considering that most listicles are headlined with some variation of “50 hottest …” “8 simple steps …” or “The Best and Worst….” Not exactly normal fodder for news reporting.

But news has been adapting since its invention — from printing presses to radio to TV to digital. Listicles aren’t likely going away any time soon.

So why not give the approach a go?

The MozFest test

All this fretting over listicles boils down to the same thing: news deserves to be known. And if making sure the news is read means compromising some paragraphs, couldn’t it be worth it?

As my MozFest session discovered, the answer isn’t yes or no. It’s complicated.

Just because it’s easier to read a listicle, doesn’t mean it’s easier to write one.

During MozFest, I asked groups of two to three people to take a traditional news article and find a way to tell the same information in a listicle format. I didn’t want a complete retelling, but a new approach that could summarize the most important content and give the reader a jumping-off point if they wanted to learn more.

At the end of the session, the participants presented their freshly-curated listicles. About half the groups found success with the approach, by using timelines, questions and numbered items to engage the reader with their content.

The other half, however, concluded that a listicle could not appropriately share the news.


And that’s okay.

I had given some groups articles that were financially or politically complex, or touched on topics that would be insensitive to relay in a list format. These groups decided that a listicle approach wouldn’t work for that particular story and they brainstormed other ways to make the content more engaging through graphs, video explainers or a drop-down menu for sections of the article.

A key takeaway from the session is that the effectiveness of a news listicle depends not just on how well it is done, but on the subject matter itself. Several attendees concluded that just because it’s easier to read a listicle, doesn’t mean it’s easier to write one.

Structured news, digestible news.

While researching my session, I read about how our working memory needs sensible structure to retain information. We simply understand better when there’s an organized format with a start and an end. Listicles do just that.

They aren’t always going to work, as the MozFest session proved. But they can be used by news organizations to their advantage, which many already do. See the Washington Post's “9 questions you were too embarrassed to ask about Syria” and Vox's “6 biggest myths about ebola” for two great examples.

I don’t believe listicles should overtake traditional news storytelling. But I know that people are lazy, busy and bored. If we’re scrolling through our newsfeed with three minutes to spare, we’re probably going to click on “X number of things you didn’t know,” rather than “This important thing happened in a lot of paragraphs.”

If we can find ways to present the news in a more engaging, digestible format, we can reach a whole segment of the population that otherwise would have never been informed. Used effectively, listicles can benefit a reader’s comprehension and the increase likelihood of being shared, thus reaching a greater audience. Used inappropriately, the listicle could be a disservice to the story.

Ultimately, Listicles are just one of the latest additions to a long line of storytelling developments. They certainly won't be the last. It's important to be aware of how a new format or tool can enhance the story — and how it falls short. Regarding any of these new formats, and listicles as well, we should ask: Would this change improve the audience's experience? Am I doing the story justice?

The only way to move forward is to experiment with the new.

About the author

Mallory Busch

Undergraduate Fellow

Latest Posts

  • A Big Change That Will Probably Affect Your Storymaps

    A big change is coming to StoryMapJS, and it will affect many, if not most existing storymaps. When making a storymap, one way to set a style and tone for your project is to set the "map type," also known as the "basemap." When we launched StoryMapJS, it included options for a few basemaps created by Stamen Design. These included the "watercolor" style, as well as the default style for new storymaps, "Toner Lite." Stamen...

    Continue Reading

  • Introducing AmyJo Brown, Knight Lab Professional Fellow

    AmyJo Brown, a veteran journalist passionate about supporting and reshaping local political journalism and who it engages, has joined the Knight Lab as a 2022-2023 professional fellow. Her focus is on building The Public Ledger, a data tool structured from local campaign finance data that is designed to track connections and make local political relationships – and their influence – more visible. “Campaign finance data has more stories to tell – if we follow the...

    Continue Reading

  • Interactive Entertainment: How UX Design Shapes Streaming Platforms

    As streaming develops into the latest age of entertainment, how are interfaces and layouts being designed to prioritize user experience and accessibility? The Covid-19 pandemic accelerated streaming services becoming the dominant form of entertainment. There are a handful of new platforms, each with thousands of hours of content, but not much change or differentiation in the user journeys. For the most part, everywhere from Netflix to illegal streaming platforms use similar video streaming UX standards, and...

    Continue Reading

  • Innovation with collaborationExperimenting with AI and investigative journalism in the Americas.

    Lee este artículo en español. How might we use AI technologies to innovate newsgathering and investigative reporting techniques? This was the question we posed to a group of seven newsrooms in Latin America and the US as part of the Americas Cohort during the 2021 JournalismAI Collab Challenges. The Collab is an initiative that brings together media organizations to experiment with AI technologies and journalism. This year,  JournalismAI, a project of Polis, the journalism think-tank at...

    Continue Reading

  • Innovación con colaboraciónCuando el periodismo de investigación experimenta con inteligencia artificial.

    Read this article in English. ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para innovar las técnicas de reporteo y de periodismo de investigación? Esta es la pregunta que convocó a un grupo de siete organizaciones periodísticas en América Latina y Estados Unidos, el grupo de las Américas del 2021 JournalismAI Collab Challenges. Esta iniciativa de colaboración reúne a medios para experimentar con inteligencia artificial y periodismo. Este año, JournalismAI, un proyecto de Polis, la think-tank de periodismo...

    Continue Reading

  • AI, Automation, and Newsrooms: Finding Fitting Tools for Your Organization

    If you’d like to use technology to make your newsroom more efficient, you’ve come to the right place. Tools exist that can help you find news, manage your work in progress, and distribute your content more effectively than ever before, and we’re here to help you find the ones that are right for you. As part of the Knight Foundation’s AI for Local News program, we worked with the Associated Press to interview dozens of......

    Continue Reading

Storytelling Tools

We build easy-to-use tools that can help you tell better stories.

View More